Match statistics snapshot
- Mito Hollyhock created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 0.98, Δ 0.22).
- Machida Zelvia fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Mito Hollyhock held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.98 |
| Offsides | ||
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 444Lead | Accurate passes | 264 |
| 532Lead | Total passes | 350 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mito Hollyhock | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.