Match statistics snapshot
- Mjallby AIF created the clearer chances on xG (1.76 vs 1.08, Δ 0.68).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 7%).
- BK Hacken held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 1.76Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.08 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 172 | Accurate passes | 391Lead |
| 263 | Total passes | 482Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |