Match statistics snapshot
- Mjallby AIF created the clearer chances on xG (2.11 vs 1.41, Δ 0.70).
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (24 vs 11 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 2.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.41 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 402Lead | Accurate passes | 207 |
| 497Lead | Total passes | 307 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |