Match statistics snapshot
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Halmstad was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 8%).
- Mjallby AIF held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 490Lead | Accurate passes | 338 |
| 572Lead | Total passes | 428 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.