Match statistics snapshot
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Halmstad was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target |
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 381Lead | Accurate passes | 337 |
| 452Lead | Total passes | 431 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |