Match statistics snapshot
- Mjallby AIF created the clearer chances on xG (1.32 vs 0.80, Δ 0.52).
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 1.32Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.80 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 426Lead | Accurate passes | 289 |
| 508Lead | Total passes | 374 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |