Match statistics snapshot
- Halmstad fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 11%).
- Mjallby AIF held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 499Lead | Accurate passes | 301 |
| 597Lead | Total passes | 373 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.