Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby FF created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 1.69, Δ 0.50).
- Hammarby FF fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.69Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 276 | Accurate passes | 433Lead |
| 355 | Total passes | 515Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |