Match statistics snapshot
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 30%).
- IF elfsborg held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 263 | Accurate passes | 388Lead |
| 346 | Total passes | 478Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |