Match statistics snapshot
- Mjallby AIF created the clearer chances on xG (1.23 vs 1.14, Δ 0.09).
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- IFK Varnamo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 39%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Ifk Varnamo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Ifk Varnamo |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 508Lead | Accurate passes | 325 |
| 596Lead | Total passes | 408 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Ifk Varnamo |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Ifk Varnamo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Ifk Varnamo |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.