Match statistics snapshot
- Mjallby AIF created the clearer chances on xG (2.00 vs 0.98, Δ 1.02).
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 2.00Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.98 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 430Lead | Accurate passes | 309 |
| 512Lead | Total passes | 391 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |