Match statistics snapshot
- Molde created the clearer chances on xG (2.21 vs 1.21, Δ 1.00).
- Haugesund fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- Haugesund held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Molde | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 2.21Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Molde | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 393 | Accurate passes | 454Lead |
| 455 | Total passes | 520Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Molde | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Molde | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Molde | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |