Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Molde was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 40%).
- Molde held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Molde | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 2 |
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Molde | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 492Lead | Accurate passes | 323 |
| 603Lead | Total passes | 412 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Molde | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Molde | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Molde | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |