Match statistics snapshot
- Monaco created the clearer chances on xG (3.67 vs 1.43, Δ 2.24).
- Monaco fired more attempts (23 vs 9 shots).
- Monaco was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Monaco | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 3.67Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.43 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Monaco | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 486Lead | Accurate passes | 269 |
| 566Lead | Total passes | 336 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Monaco | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Monaco | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Monaco | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |