Match statistics snapshot
- Monterrey fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Monterrey | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead |
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Monterrey | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 363Lead | Accurate passes | 355 |
| 425Lead | Total passes | 420 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Monterrey | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Monterrey | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Monterrey | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.