Match statistics snapshot
- Montpellier created the clearer chances on xG (2.80 vs 0.43, Δ 2.37).
- Montpellier fired more attempts (32 vs 5 shots).
- Montpellier was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 2.80Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.43 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 32Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 452Lead | Accurate passes | 252 |
| 563Lead | Total passes | 362 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 6 | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.