Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (0.83 vs 2.08, Δ 1.25).
- Lens fired more attempts (19 vs 14 shots).
- Lens was more accurate in front of goal (26% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 0.83 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.08Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 346 | Accurate passes | 365Lead |
| 429 | Total passes | 440Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.42 | Goals prevented | 0.42 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |