Match statistics snapshot
- Montpellier created the clearer chances on xG (3.01 vs 1.29, Δ 1.72).
- Montpellier fired more attempts (21 vs 14 shots).
- Montpellier held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 3.01Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.29 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 319Lead | Accurate passes | 275 |
| 395Lead | Total passes | 340 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |