Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (0.90 vs 2.17, Δ 1.27).
- Como fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- Monza was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 41%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Monza | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.90 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.17Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Monza | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 93%Lead |
| 363 | Accurate passes | 551Lead |
| 414 | Total passes | 593Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Monza | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Monza | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.67 | Goals prevented | 0.67 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Monza | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 19Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |