Match statistics snapshot
- Moroka Swallows fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Cape Town City was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 36%).
- Moroka Swallows held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Moroka Swallows | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 4Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Moroka Swallows | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 286Lead | Accurate passes | 177 |
| 389Lead | Total passes | 274 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Moroka Swallows | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Moroka Swallows | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Moroka Swallows | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 24 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.