Match statistics snapshot
- Moss created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 0.75, Δ 0.31).
- Haugesund fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Moss was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Moss | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.75 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Moss | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 302 | Accurate passes | 413Lead |
| 405 | Total passes | 499Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Moss | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Moss | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Moss | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.