Match statistics snapshot
- Motor Lublin created the clearer chances on xG (2.51 vs 2.02, Δ 0.49).
- Jagiellonia fired more attempts (21 vs 15 shots).
- Jagiellonia was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Motor Lublin | Statistic | Jagiellonia |
|---|---|---|
| 2.51Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.02 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Motor Lublin | Statistic | Jagiellonia |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 290 | Accurate passes | 315Lead |
| 372 | Total passes | 386Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Motor Lublin | Statistic | Jagiellonia |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Motor Lublin | Statistic | Jagiellonia |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Motor Lublin | Statistic | Jagiellonia |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.