Match statistics snapshot
- Piast Gliwice created the clearer chances on xG (0.61 vs 2.64, Δ 2.03).
- Piast Gliwice fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- Piast Gliwice was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Motor Lublin | Statistic | Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|
| 0.61 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.64Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Motor Lublin | Statistic | Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 414Lead | Accurate passes | 322 |
| 488Lead | Total passes | 407 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Motor Lublin | Statistic | Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Motor Lublin | Statistic | Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Motor Lublin | Statistic | Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.