Match statistics snapshot
- Verl created the clearer chances on xG (0.58 vs 2.11, Δ 1.53).
- Verl fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- MSV Duisburg was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Msv Duisburg | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 0.58 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.11Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Msv Duisburg | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 20% | Ball possession | 80%Lead |
| 59% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 79 | Accurate passes | 618Lead |
| 134 | Total passes | 695Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Msv Duisburg | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Msv Duisburg | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Msv Duisburg | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.