Match statistics snapshot
- MVV fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- FC OSS was more accurate in front of goal (78% on target vs 29%).
- MVV held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mvv | Statistic | Fc Oss |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead |
| 1 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mvv | Statistic | Fc Oss |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 374Lead | Accurate passes | 182 |
| 451Lead | Total passes | 268 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mvv | Statistic | Fc Oss |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mvv | Statistic | Fc Oss |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mvv | Statistic | Fc Oss |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |