Match statistics snapshot
- Albirex Niigata created the clearer chances on xG (1.53 vs 3.33, Δ 1.80).
- Albirex Niigata fired more attempts (18 vs 15 shots).
- Nagoya Grampus was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 28%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Albirex Niigata |
|---|---|---|
| 1.53 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.33Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Albirex Niigata |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 278 | Accurate passes | 548Lead |
| 356 | Total passes | 627Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Albirex Niigata |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Albirex Niigata |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Albirex Niigata |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |