Match statistics snapshot
- Cerezo Osaka created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 1.72, Δ 0.55).
- Cerezo Osaka fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Nagoya Grampus was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.72Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 212 | Accurate passes | 482Lead |
| 299 | Total passes | 570Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.