Match statistics snapshot
- FC Tokyo fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- FC Tokyo was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 20%).
- Nagoya Grampus held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 2 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 573Lead | Accurate passes | 267 |
| 666Lead | Total passes | 330 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |