Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus was more accurate in front of goal (14% on target vs 0%).
- FC Tokyo held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5Lead |
| 4 |
| 1Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 270 | Accurate passes | 469Lead |
| 369 | Total passes | 576Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |