Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus created the clearer chances on xG (1.72 vs 1.19, Δ 0.53).
- FC Tokyo fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- FC Tokyo held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.72Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.19 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 180 | Accurate passes | 467Lead |
| 278 | Total passes | 565Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |