Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus created the clearer chances on xG (1.38 vs 0.69, Δ 0.69).
- Kashima fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Nagoya Grampus was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 1.38Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.69 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 186 | Accurate passes | 461Lead |
| 266 | Total passes | 541Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.