Match statistics snapshot
- Kashima created the clearer chances on xG (0.31 vs 1.00, Δ 0.69).
- Kashima fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Kashima was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 0.31 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 436Lead | Accurate passes | 314 |
| 535Lead | Total passes | 412 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.