Match statistics snapshot
- Kashima created the clearer chances on xG (1.28 vs 1.50, Δ 0.22).
- Nagoya Grampus fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- Kashima was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 1.28 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.50Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 372Lead | Accurate passes | 325 |
| 447Lead | Total passes | 391 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.