Match statistics snapshot
- Kawasaki Frontale fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Kawasaki Frontale was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 30%).
- Kawasaki Frontale held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 4 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 418 | Accurate passes | 544Lead |
| 492 | Total passes | 625Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Kawasaki Frontale |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |