Match statistics snapshot
- Machida Zelvia created the clearer chances on xG (0.36 vs 2.53, Δ 2.17).
- Machida Zelvia fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- Nagoya Grampus was more accurate in front of goal (20% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 0.36 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.53Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 312Lead | Accurate passes | 216 |
| 421Lead | Total passes | 311 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Machida Zelvia |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.