Match statistics snapshot
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 31%).
- Nagoya Grampus held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 7 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 487Lead | Accurate passes | 401 |
| 549Lead | Total passes | 464 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.