Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus created the clearer chances on xG (0.84 vs 0.43, Δ 0.41).
- Shimizu S-pulse fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Nagoya Grampus was more accurate in front of goal (22% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 0.84Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.43 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 285 | Accurate passes | 369Lead |
| 376 | Total passes | 451Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.