Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus created the clearer chances on xG (1.43 vs 0.72, Δ 0.71).
- Nagoya Grampus fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Shimizu S-pulse was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 1.43Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.72 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 328Lead | Accurate passes | 295 |
| 428Lead | Total passes | 390 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |