Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus created the clearer chances on xG (0.62 vs 0.59, Δ 0.03).
- Tokyo Verdy was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 14%).
- Tokyo Verdy held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Tokyo Verdy |
|---|---|---|
| 0.62Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.59 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Tokyo Verdy |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 228 | Accurate passes | 367Lead |
| 314 | Total passes | 455Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Tokyo Verdy |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Tokyo Verdy |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Tokyo Verdy |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |