Match statistics snapshot
- Vissel Kobe created the clearer chances on xG (1.03 vs 1.15, Δ 0.12).
- Nagoya Grampus fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Vissel Kobe was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 1.03 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 339Lead | Accurate passes | 300 |
| 433Lead | Total passes | 390 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.