Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (18 vs 17 shots).
- Clermont Foot was more accurate in front of goal (28% on target vs 18%).
- Clermont Foot held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nancy | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
| 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 17 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nancy | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 288 | Accurate passes | 447Lead |
| 378 | Total passes | 547Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nancy | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nancy | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nancy | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |