Match statistics snapshot
- Montpellier created the clearer chances on xG (0.91 vs 1.84, Δ 0.93).
- Montpellier was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 23%).
- Montpellier held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nantes | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 0.91 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.84Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nantes | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 311 | Accurate passes | 435Lead |
| 368 | Total passes | 513Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nantes | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nantes | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nantes | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.