Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (0.78 vs 1.07, Δ 0.29).
- Napoli was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 15%).
- Como held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Napoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.78 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.07Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Napoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 320 | Accurate passes | 414Lead |
| 392 | Total passes | 484Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Napoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Napoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 1.06 | Goals prevented | 1.06 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Napoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |