Match statistics snapshot
- Napoli created the clearer chances on xG (1.69 vs 0.56, Δ 1.13).
- Napoli fired more attempts (22 vs 6 shots).
- Napoli held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Napoli | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 1.69Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.56 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Napoli | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 93%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 781Lead | Accurate passes | 283 |
| 842Lead | Total passes | 344 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Napoli | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Napoli | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Napoli | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |