Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.48 vs 0.33, Δ 1.15).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 1.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.33 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 242 | Accurate passes | 533Lead |
| 325 | Total passes | 616Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.