Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (2.38 vs 0.64, Δ 1.74).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (19 vs 16 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 2.38Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.64 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 314 | Accurate passes | 539Lead |
| 385 | Total passes | 598Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.