Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.41 vs 0.44, Δ 0.97).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 18%).
- Charlotte held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 1.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.44 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 244 | Accurate passes | 462Lead |
| 324 | Total passes | 528Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.