Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (0.31 vs 0.55, Δ 0.24).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (10 vs 5 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0.31 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 369 | Accurate passes | 586Lead |
| 419 | Total passes | 640Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.64 | Goals prevented | -0.64 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.