Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (4.66 vs 0.53, Δ 4.13).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (18 vs 8 shots).
- Nashville SC held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 4.66Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 520Lead | Accurate passes | 356 |
| 589Lead | Total passes | 433 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.70 | Goals prevented | -0.70 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.