Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (2.42 vs 0.70, Δ 1.72).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (59% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 2.42Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.70 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 309 | Accurate passes | 344Lead |
| 382 | Total passes | 422Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.